The supreme court of the United States has ruled that Lisa Cook can continue serving in her position.

Date:

Share post:

Direitos de autor AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File
Imagem: TomasHa73/Pexels

The U.S. Supreme Court decided that Lisa Cook can continue serving as the director of the Fed while her lawsuit against President Donald Trump proceeds.

The lawyers’ oral support phase is planned for January.

The ruling is seen as a defeat for Trump, who has been attempting to remove Cook from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors since the start of the year but has been unsuccessful in the federal courts.

Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Financing Agency, initiated the process by alleging that Cook committed fraud by stating multiple properties as primary residences in mortgage applications.

The governor owns real estate in Michigan, Georgia, and Massachusetts.

Trump announced Cook’s resignation based on the charges, but she contested the decision, alleging its illegality.

Trump goes back to the Justice Department to fire Lisa Cook.

The White House strengthened its efforts on Sunday to remove the Federal Reserve director, Lisa Cook, by submitting a document to the Washington Circuit Appeal Court.

The government contends that President Donald Trump’s decision from the Republican Party to remove him from office is justified.

The document aims to revoke the earlier decision that had blocked Cook’s resignation, mentioning that the president has the power to appoint and dismiss directors of the Fed according to the Constitution and existing laws.

The White House also asserts that the director failed to meet specific performance standards and that his exit is essential for the effective implementation of monetary policy.

Lisa Cook challenges the resignation and argues that the decision to remove her lacks legal justification and constitutes unjustified interference in Fed’s autonomy.

READ ALSO  Trump brings up 'The Apprentice' in a fresh criticism of Jerome Powell.

Constitutional law experts are closely monitoring the case, as it could greatly affect the independence of the US central bank.

The legal conflict continues in the Court of Appeals, with no option for an instant ruling.

  • News articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related articles

USA attempts to end ‘shutdown’ with vote that did not succeed.

The U.S. government shut down on Wednesday (1st) and the initial vote to end the shutdown was unsuccessful...

Work opportunities in the field of applications have increased by 170% over the past decade, according to BC.

A report by the BC Monetary Policy Report found that the rise of digital transportation and delivery services...

Gerdau (GGBR4) reduces investments in 2026 due to Chinese steel competition.

Gerdau (GGBR4) announced a reduced investment of R $ 4.7 billion in 2026, which is 21.7% lower than...

Goal and Blue finalize merger and codeshare deal in Brazil.

The Gol (GOLL54) and Blue (AZUL4) airlines have ended talks about a potential merger.Companies confirmed on Thursday night...